Why I founded Prudentia

I was a member of another well-known high IQ society – you have most certainly heard its name – in the years 2002 to 2014. It was the first high IQ society I joined, and for a long time I had no interest in joining any other high IQ society. As a matter of fact, it was the onlyhigh IQ society I knew that regularly held real-life, face-to-face gatherings in Austria. These gatherings were the primary reason why I was interested in being a member of such a society: in order to meet people in person and learn how to handle them. Previously, I had almost no contacts to intellectual peers face to face, but as I had a couple of penpals who were apparently very intelligent it was obvious that there had to be some who could match my cognitive abilities.

In the course of the years I learned more about the history of that high IQ society. It turned out it was founded by a psychologist in the 1960s, who had good intentions. He wanted to create a society both for highly educated people and for people with little formal education. His intention was to encourage those with little education to go back to school, study and obtain degrees so that they would be able to rise into positions in society which would enable them to use their intellect for the benefit of mankind.

Unfortunately it turned out that the society did not live up to its promises. One of the reasons may have been that the founder was not strict enough when admitting new members. As I heard, sometimes he would admit members even if they did not score high enough on the admission test. It also turned out that many members who did not have university degrees had no interest in studying and were satisfied with their lives although they were not in positions respected by society. In the end, the high IQ society deteriorated because some of these people became members of the board of directors and used their power to actively suppress those members who had higher aspirations. This is what eventually made me leave that society.

I founded Prudentia in July 2018 because, after four years of communicating with high IQ people mostly via the Internet, I was longing for real-life, face-to-face meetings again. It was clear that the aforementioned people in the other well-known high IQ society would not accept me. After a lot of pondering over various concepts (including the idea of a society that is not about IQ, but about academic credentials) I finally concluded that I would try to found a new society for people with an IQ of 140 or higher and encourage people with higher education and university graduates to join it.

Prudentia is an international society and therefore not limited to Austria or any other place. I will try to make an effort to find people living close to our current members who might be interested in joining as well, so that we will have real-life, face-to-face gatherings at various places in the world. My plan also includes scientific debate and opportunities to work on research projects together with other university graduates. Let's hope I will succeed.

Claus Volko, cdvolko (at) gmail (dot) com 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Proof that Every Grammar for English has Self-Embedding to an Unbounded Depth

Authors: Daniel Pohl, Iakovos Koukas, Noam Chomsky Introduction The distinction between competence and performance has played a foundational role in the philosophy of linguistics. Competence is a grasp of the structural properties of all the sentences of a language. Performance involves actual real-time use and may diverge from the underlying competence. Idealizing away from psycholinguistically relevant factors like limits on memory and processing plays a significant role in various essential debates within the field of linguistics. Perhaps the most central and famous is the issue of whether English is a finite-state language. This article provides a proof of the relevant theorem, originally from Chomsky 1959. The claim that any finite-state automaton does not accept English is supported by showing that every grammar for English has self-embedding to an unbounded depth. Self-Embedding The economical production forms for context-free languages, especially the Chomsky normal-for
Read more

Symbiont Conversion Theory

Abstract Symbiont Conversion Theory is a new scientific theory, summarizing and generalizing efforts that have been made by various researchers in the past years; it could even be perceived as a new scientific paradigm. This theory states that microorganisms and cells which are commonly considered to display parasitic behaviour can be "educated" and transformed into symbionts. This is not just a hypothesis but a theory since there is already evidence that proves that this is possible. The primary motivation for developing this theory is the failure of classical approaches to therapy of cancer and infectious diseases that follow the paradigm "destroy and kill". It is common knowledge about medical doctors that chemotherapy and radiation therapy have detrimental side effects on healthy, functional tissue, and also that antibiotics can harm benevolent cells. These negative side effects can possibly be avoided by the new approach of treating parasitic diseases by conver
Read more

Optimal IQ: A Speculative Model

Image
How we profit from IQ is frequently talked about in IQ societies. And the foregone conclusion: the higher the better . However, turns out there’s a cost associated with higher IQ, one put forth in a recent paper[1] indicating the good of high intelligence; more opportunities, higher self–awareness, etc and the more elusive bad or dark side to higher IQ; imbalances (mental and physical), debilitation, etc. In other words, there is a cost associated with IQ increase beyond some as yet, unknown value. Now, optimality, as we all know, is not necessarily being on top of the heap or at a maximum. Take an aspirin, it will get rid of a headache. Take a bottle of aspirin and you’ll be in the ER getting your stomach pumped. Even money— turns out you don’t want to make too much —has an optimal value being about $95,000.00 US dollars per year in the long run, that is, if one wants to be happy— optimally of course. Too, to determine optimality, as we all have learned, requires in the simplest sense
Read more