Posts

The Biotech Century Revisited: What Rifkin and Ridley Got Right—and Wrong

In August 2000, I reviewed two books on genetics and biotechnology: The Biotech Century by Jeremy Rifkin and Genome: The Autobiography of a Species in 23 Chapters by Matt Ridley . At the time, the Human Genome Project was nearing completion, CRISPR did not yet exist, and “biotech” still felt like a futuristic industry rather than a daily reality. A quarter century later, we can now evaluate these works not as speculation—but as forecasts. The result is fascinating: both authors were right in surprisingly deep ways, yet both also missed critical dynamics that define biotechnology today. 1. The Rise of Biotechnology: Rifkin Was Early—but Not Entirely Right Rifkin predicted that biotechnology would become the dominant economic force of the 21st century. Verdict: Partially correct. Biotech is undeniably central today: mRNA vaccines (e.g. COVID-19 response) Gene editing using CRISPR-Cas9 Synthetic biology startups Personalized medicine However, biotech did not replace the...
Post a Comment
Read more

Genome - The Autobiography of a Species

Image
British science journalist Matt Ridley has written an unusual popular-scientific book: In 23 chapters, the autobiography of the human species is told - each of these chapters correspond with one of a human cell's 23 chromosome pairs. From each chromosome Ridley has picked one or a group of genes, which gave him the topics for the individual chapters.    Contents Overview Ridley starts with the origin of life and human genealogy, then ventures into the history of genetics as a branch of science. Many of the following chapters then deal with particular features caused by genes. Even though Ridley keeps repeating the phrase "Genes are not there to cause diseases", sometimes even in capital letters, diseases are also one of the topics of many chapters; he tells us about research on genetic causes of Alzheimer and Huntington's diseases, asthma and cholera, and so on. A chapter is also dedicated to eugenics, another on cure of illnesses by somatic and ger...
Post a Comment
Read more

Jeremy Rifkin: The Biotech Century

Image
This is not a scientific book. It is not even popular-scientific. It has been written by an interested layman for interested laymen. It is, therefore, comparable to Bill Gates' "The Road Ahead". (Bill Gates is also little involved in computer science; he is good at discovering new business opportunities and organizing, though.) The only differences are: Rifkin does not claim to be visionary, and is critical. Moreover, the topic of course is not the data highway but the emerging biotechnology industry.     The Author Rifkin studied economy and is president of the Foundation on Economic Trends in Washington, D.C. He has raised his voice about several new technologies - this is not his first publication on genetics and biotech, either - and initiated debates by pointing out potential dangers. This is his fourteenth book. Contents The industrial era is about to end. Raw materials like oil have become scarce. In the new century, biotechnology will become th...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Impossibility of Metaphysical Closure for Finite Agents

Preface I have been searching back and forth for a long time, trying out many partial approaches and incomplete answers. Each attempt illuminated something, but none of them fully resolved the problem. What follows is the first explanation that actually closes the issue. It is simple, structural, and does not depend on any special metaphysical assumptions. It shows, in a straightforward way, why no finite agent can ever achieve a complete and final account of all truths. Abstract This paper argues that no finite agent can ever achieve metaphysical closure — the idea that an agent’s reasons, concepts, and methods could cover the entire space of possible propositions. The core issue is structural: a finite agent’s justificatory resources are fixed and determinate, while the total space of propositions it faces is not. Because the agent cannot determine or survey the full range of possible propositions, it cannot know whether its resources cover that range. From this mismatch alone, w...
Post a Comment
Read more

A Tiny Universe and the Impossibility of Metaphysical Closure

  A Tiny Universe and the Impossibility of Metaphysical Closure Kenneth Myers Abstract This paper introduces a Tiny Universe (TU) : the simplest possible epistemic universe containing only three ingredients—an observer, a world‑state, and a translation method that turns the world into something the observer can understand. This minimal structure is enough to reveal a universal limitation: an observer never has direct access to the world itself, only to the translated output produced by their own method of access. Because the observer cannot step outside this translation method to evaluate its completeness or accuracy, they cannot determine whether their picture of the world is final or complete. The TU shows that this limitation is not a feature of complex metaphysical theories but a structural fact that arises in any universe containing an observer. From this, it follows that metaphysical closure—the idea of a complete, self‑contained explanation of reality—is impossible in p...
Post a Comment
Read more