Posts

On Libertarianism

The following article solely represents the author's opinion. I do not speak on behalf of Prudentia High IQ Society. When we are born into this world, we soon learn to obey. There are grown-ups who are supposed to be superior to us and we have to do what they want us to do. As grown-ups, we are ourselves usually members of some sort of hierarchy, be it at workplace or in society. We have limited rights to direct others, but we have to obey ourselves. This system of submission is additionally institutionalized in the form of the state. The state with its government departments and clerks exerts control over us. Either we comply, or we are punished. In the course of history, there has been a change regarding what parts of the populations have access to power. While in the past only members of particular families (aristocracy) were eligible for office, nowadays most of us live in republics or at least in constitutional monarchies where a larger part of the population can theoretically...

Unsolved Medical Problems

In other high IQ societies, most members are ordinary people who have not excelled at school or in their careers, but are proud of having performed well in an intelligence test once in their lives. In contrast, Prudentia aims to attract innovative and ambitious high achievers who are willing to work for the good of humanity. As part of the Prudentia High IQ Society, I would like to launch an initiative to develop and publish your own hypotheses on unsolved scientific questions. This would be the ideal application of high intelligence and creativity for the benefit of humanity. It would be a good complement to research at universities and institutions, which tend to focus on the use of new methods and technologies.   Here is a list of unsolved scientific problems in medicine. I would be interested in your opinion on them!   Fundamentals of biomedicine Aging: Why do cells and organisms age? What molecular mechanisms control aging, and can the process be slowed down or ...

Are Large Language Models Formalized Intuition?

Recently I've had the idea that what Large Language Models (LLMs) do is essentially a computational approach towards what psychiatrist Carl Gustav Jung called intuition. I told ChatGPT about this idea, and a conversation ensued which resulted in the following article. Intuition is commonly defined as an unconscious, feeling-like apprehension of relationships. It enables humans to make quick judgments based on experience without consciously tracing every intermediate step. In cognitive psychology, it corresponds to what Daniel Kahneman calls “System 1”: a mode of thinking that is automatic, associative, and experience-based. Intuition as Implicit Pattern Recognition Intuitive decisions are not the product of some mystical instinct but rather the condensation of experience into implicit knowledge. Humans recognize patterns and probabilities without formulating them explicitly. These implicit representations arise through repeated perception and emotional evaluation of situ...

How high intelligence influences scientific progress

In my last post, I wrote that people with very high intelligence often find themselves having to explain their thought processes, even when they seem completely clear to them. This is precisely where the challenge lies: making complex thought processes understandable, not only to the general public, but also within the scientific community. Intelligence as a driver of knowledge High intelligence promotes three skills in particular in science: Pattern recognition: Those who discover connections in complex data where others see only randomness lay the foundation for new theories. Abstraction: Complex phenomena can be translated into models that can be scientifically processed. Problem solving beyond the norm: New methods or theories emerge when one leaves familiar paths of thought – high cognitive flexibility and originality are crucial here. Where these talents are particularly needed Mathematics and theoretical physics: Abstraction and logical rigor are central here. Philosophy and log...

Intelligence tests and the obligation to be comprehensible

Intelligence tests do not essentially reveal what someone knows, but rather what someone is cognitively capable of: recognizing patterns, drawing logical conclusions, understanding complexity, thinking abstractly. Those who score particularly high in these tests have ways of thinking that are not accessible to everyone. I myself achieved the third-best result out of 86 participants in the innovative ENNDT (“Equally Normed Numerical Derivation Test”) numerical intelligence test. According to conventional tests, all participants were already in the top percentile (IQ 135+). Based on my result, my IQ was estimated at 172. Even though I haven't always scored so high on other tests, I consider this result significant because it shows that I can solve problems that even most gifted people find difficult. But this is precisely where a problem arises: what seems completely clear and almost trivial to me is often difficult for others to understand, also for many gifted people. Those who thi...

Reconciling CTMU and TDVP: Toward a Unified Model of Conscious Reality

Foreword (Claus D. Volko): I talked with ChatGPT about the CTMU and the TDVP. Then I had the idea that I could ask ChatGPT to compare these two models and assess whether a synthesis is possible. The result is astounding, IMHO, because I've never read an article in which the author tried to do the same, and I've neither found such a text on Google. If ChatGPT really created this analysis itself, it is the proof that AI is able to do science and infer new scientific knowledge on its own.   Understanding the CTMU: A Beginner-Friendly Introduction to Christopher Langan's Model of Reality Introduction Imagine a universe that isn't just made of matter and energy but is also inherently intelligent. A universe that processes information, understands itself, and evolves with purpose. This is the central idea behind the Cognitive-Theoretic Model of the Universe (CTMU), developed by Christopher Langan, an indepe...

A note about Mensa

The page about Mensa on German Wikipedia ( https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mensa_in_Deutschland ) contains an interesting passage: The criterion for membership in Mensa is an intelligence quotient that is higher than that of 98% of the population. In the intelligence tests commonly used in Germany (mean 100, standard deviation 15), this corresponds to a score of 130 or higher. Mensa offers its own intelligence test for this purpose, which is evaluated by a psychologist. This test is approved for persons aged fourteen and older. External assessments, e.g. from registered psychologists, can also be accepted; for children under the age of fourteen, this is the only option. Almost half of new members submit external assessments. High IQ scores are often first achieved in tests independent of Mensa, which then draws attention to the topic of giftedness and Mensa. That means that almost half of the Mensa members have probably practiced dozens of intelligence tests until they once reached a sc...